×
GreekEnglish

×
  • Politics
  • Diaspora
  • World
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Cooking
Sunday
27
Jul 2025
weather symbol
Athens 31°C
  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • World
  • Diaspora
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Culture
  • Sports
  • Mediterranean Cooking
  • Weather
Contact follow Protothema:
Powered by Cloudevo
> Politics

Why the Trump Administration is wrong on Libya

If Eastern Mediterranean stability is the White House and State Department goal, they should first withdrawal U.S. recognition from Sarraj

Newsroom August 6 02:33

On August 4, 2020, National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien issued a statement lamenting escalating conflict in Libya. “We strongly oppose foreign military involvement, including the use of mercenaries and private military contractors, by all sides,” he wrote, adding, “Escalation will only deepen and prolong the conflict.” It was the type of anodyne but ultimately meaningless statement that passes for substantive diplomacy when none exists. “Libyans can win only if they come together to reclaim their sovereignty and rebuild a unified country,” he stated.

Moral equivalence blinds. Who wins matters. There are two main sides to the conflict. Fayez al-Sarraj is the prime minister of the Government of National Accord based in Tripoli, and Khalifa Haftar who answers to the elected House of Representatives based in Tobruk. Both are deeply-flawed individuals. Sarraj is an Islamist who has not only welcomed Turkish interference and the Islamic State veterans who now populate Turkish-backed proxy forces, but also sold his country’s birthright to Turkey in exchange for his protection against challengers. Haftar, on the other hand, is autocratic and untrustworthy; the State Department resists dealing with him because they fear he would sell them out to Moscow, while the Kremlin assesses that he could just as easily flip on them. Adding to the complexity is the fact that those fighting for each are motivated more by hatred of the other than by loyalty to their leader. What this means in practice is that if either Haftar or Sarraj is defeated, the victorious forces are likely to turn on each other almost immediately.

That does not mean the United States can afford to be neutral, even if neither leader is a democrat. While Haftar includes some Islamists in his ruling coalition, his coalition’s broader outlook is more secular. More importantly, by subordinating himself to Turkey and by welcoming Islamic State veterans into proxies working on his behalf, Sarraj has forfeited any claim to leadership.

See Also:

Panic in international banks, they want to get rid of the Turkish lira

>Related articles

The longest solar eclipse in history will plunge earth into darkness for 7 minutes

Mitsotakis takes a hardline stance on national issues — Slams ‘Twitter diplomacy’

Financial Times: EU–US near agreement on 15% tariffs on European Imports

The worm is in the fruit: A rising strategic foe inside NATO

The State Department might wring its hands with regard to escalation in Libya, but a dispassionate assessment shows these concerns overwrought. Certainly, Turkey has managed to reverse the momentum of Haftar’s drive toward Tripoli by serial violations of the UN arms embargo, but Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has made a significant error. Without a doubt, the Turkish leader has for well-over a decade taken a pair of twos and beat a royal flush because of the timidity of the State Department and regional leaders unwilling to call his bluff. But, as Greece recently demonstrated, he is unwilling or unable to back his rhetoric with action; when confronted, he backs down. But what if he does not? When Egypt recently signaled it would do what it took to prevent the advance of Turkish-backed forces toward its borders, it was not bluster. Turkey supply Sarraj and its proxies with both drones and MRAPs, but the Egyptian military showed that it was able to mobilize and transport into position dozens of tanks in hours; Turkey takes days or weeks to accomplish the same movements toward Libya. Simply put, Egypt is much-better positioned to achieve its aims in Libya than can Turkey.

Read more: National Interest

Ask me anything

Explore related questions

#analysis#diplomacy#Eastern Mediterranean#Fayez al-Sarraj#libya#negotiations#opinion#politics#turkey#US President Donald Trump#usa
> More Politics

Follow en.protothema.gr on Google News and be the first to know all the news

See all the latest News from Greece and the World, the moment they happen, at en.protothema.gr

> Latest Stories

Dead sea turtle in Nea Fountain in Thessaloniki

July 27, 2025

Widespread fires across the Mediterranean — NASA satellite map reveals extent

July 27, 2025

Track & field: Tentoglou wins gold at the Balkan Championships with a single leap

July 27, 2025

Scorching heat grips the Greece as heatwave persists

July 27, 2025

He posed as an ambassador of imaginary states and deceived people for a decade – An incredible case in India

July 26, 2025

Request for European assistance for the major fires in Attica, Evia, Messinia and Kythera from the government

July 26, 2025

‘EU trade deal will be the biggest of all if reached,’ said Trump in Scotland

July 26, 2025

Western Greece scorched: Temperatures hit 45°C in Messinia – When the heatwave is expected to ease, according to Marousakis

July 26, 2025
All News

> World

Widespread fires across the Mediterranean — NASA satellite map reveals extent

Hundreds of red dots corresponding to a small or large front that is in progress

July 27, 2025

He posed as an ambassador of imaginary states and deceived people for a decade – An incredible case in India

July 26, 2025

‘EU trade deal will be the biggest of all if reached,’ said Trump in Scotland

July 26, 2025

Tragedy in Peru – 15 dead after a bus falls into a ravine

July 26, 2025

NASA announces the departure of 20% of its staff

July 26, 2025
Homepage
PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION POLICY COOKIES POLICY TERM OF USE
Powered by Cloudevo
Copyright © 2025 Πρώτο Θέμα